Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 15، number In Volume 1، April 2022 ، issue Number 71

The confrontation between me and Faraman in Rumi's intellectual structure based on the syntactic style of sentences

Esmaeil Sadegh , Shahrooz Jamali (Author in Charge), Morteza Razzaqpour

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Masnavi is one of the deepest works that has been constantly criticized, analyzed and evaluated from various angles. One of the distinctive and unique features of this masterpiece of Persian mysticism literature is the confrontational structure and the way of using this contrast in the syntactic structure of Masnavi sentences. Since the syntactic model of Masnavi in ​​the structure of reciprocal words in terms of semantic function of mystical concepts such as transcendence and superiority (command / soul of soul) versus (I / body / body), this article deals with the confrontational attitude of the structure of Masnavi sentences and its role and application in output. It deals with the meanings from the material position to the realm and the transcendence of the earthly "I" to the command in Rumi"s intellectual system and analyzes Rumi"s sentence processing by referring to the approaches of constructivist stylistics and semiotics based on text analysis in the form of structural and fundamental contrasts.

METHODOLOGY: The present study was conducted with a descriptive-analytical approach.

FINDINGS: In Rumi"s intellectual construction, all phenomena and events, including the syntactic structure of sentences, have been considered from different directions in the direction of the confrontation of body and soul or the world and the hereafter, and from the point of view of semantic and value burden of this confrontation.

CONCLUSION: By examining this syntactic structure, it can be seen that Rumi has surprisingly used this method for a purpose other than aesthetics and rhetoric in order to pay attention to the semantic dimension of contrasts within the framework of the mystical model.

Keyword
Masnavi , I , Faraman , Syntactic structure , Contrast

• Adonis, Ali Ahmad Sa’eed. (2006). Sufism and Surrealism, translated by Habibaullah Abbasi, Tehran: Sokhan, p.99.
• Antonymy: a corpus- based approach Jones. (2002). London: Routledge.
• Chandler, Daniel. (2008). Fundamentals of Semiotics, translated by Mohammad Parsa, Tehran: Sureh Mehr, pp.50-164.
• Chitik, William. (2004). The Sufi Way of Love, translated by Mehdi Sarreshtaddari, Tehran: Mehrandish, pp.17-18.
• Eagleton, Terry. (2001). An Introduction to Literary Theory, translated by Abbas Mokhber, Tehran: Markaz Publisher, p.183.
• Fotouhi Rudmajani, Mahmoud. (2018). Syntactic order and its role in speech literature, Quarterly Journal of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies, (18) 9, pp. 268-261.
• Ibn Asir, Abi al-Fatah Zia-ud-Din Nasrullah. (1939). Proverbs in the literature of writers and poets, Qadmah wa al-'Aq against Muhammad Muhyiddin Abd al-Hamid, Cairo: Mustafa al-Baya'i al-Majlis wa Olawadeh, pp.280-292.
• Ibn Mu'taz, Abdullah. (1935). Al-Badi ', Beirut: Dar al-Misra, pp.36-47.
• Ibn Torkeh Esfahani. (1996). Description of Golshan Raz by Sheikh Mahmoud Shabestari, by Kazem Dezfulian, Tehran: Afarinesh, pp.189-190.
• Ja’fari, Mohammad Taghi. (1999). Islamic mysticism, third edition, Qom: Keramati Publisher, p.21.
• Jorjani, Abdul Qahir. (1995). Asrar al-Balaghah, translated by Jalil Tajlil, Tehran: University of Tehran, p.279.
• Jung, Carl Gustav. (2011). Man in Search of the Self, translated by Mahmoud Behforozi, Tehran: Jami, p.18.
• Karimi, Yousef. (1995). Personality Psychology, Third Edition, Tehran: Payame Noor, p.87.
• Khatib Qazvini, Jalaluddin Mohammad. (2003). Illumination in the science of rhetoric, Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Alamiya, pp.259-260.
• Maulana, Jalaluddin Mohammad Balkhi. (2001). Masnavi, edited by Reynolds.A. Nicholson, Tehran: Mola.
• Pournamdarian, Taghi. (2001). In the Shadow of the Sun, Tehran: Sokhan, p.130.
• Richards, I.R. (2010). Philosophy of Rhetoric, translated by Saeed Hamidian, Tehran: Qatreh, pp.79-80.
• Sa’atchi, Mahmoud. (2004). Theories of counseling and psychotherapy, second edition, Tehran: Idon, p.9.
• Shafiee Kadkani, Mohammad Reza. (1999). Persian Psalms, Tehran: Agah, p.18.
• Shafiee Kadkani, Mohammad Reza. (2012). Poetry Music, Eleventh Edition, Tehran: Agah, p.418.
• Shafiee Kadkani, Mohammad Reza. (2012). The Resurrection of Words, Tehran: Sokhan, pp.33-34.
• Shimel, Anhamari. (2003). Shokooh Shams, translated by Hassan Lahouti, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural, p.357.
• Sojudi, Farzan. (2003). Applied Semiotics, Tehran: Qesse, p.88.
• Zamiran, Mohammad. (2004). An Introduction to the Semiotics of Art, Second Edition, Tehran: Qesse, p.112.
• Zarrinkoob, Abdolhossein. (2001). Search in Iranian Sufism, Tehran: Amirkabir, p.309.